Greek reflections on global neurosurgery.

Introduction: Large populations in middle- and low-income countries in Africa, Asia, and Central and South Americas face a dramatic neurosurgical crisis. However, large social groups in high-income countries face similar limited access to neurosurgical services. Proper identification of such a problem, analysis of the underlying causes, and proposal of potential solutions may not only address the problem at a national level, but may also provide valuable reflections on the efficient management of global neurosurgical crisis. Research question: To evaluate if special social groups face similar problems in Greece. Material and methods: The structure of the Greek health system was examined. The national census along with the registry of practicing neurosurgeons of the Greek National Society, as well as the national health map were searched. Results: A series of socio-economic factors, language barriers, cultural and religion differences, geographical barriers, the COVID-19 pandemic aftermath, along with the inherent malfunctioning of the Greek health system have led to this national neurosurgical crisis. Discussion and conclusion: An extensive redrawing of the Greek health map, reorganization of the national health system, along with adaptation of all recent advances in telemedicine may alleviate the health burden in these populations. The results of this local reformation may be applied to a global level for managing the ongoing health crisis. Moreover, the development of a European taskforce by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) may well facilitate the development of realistic and efficacious global solutions, and contribute to the global effort for providing high-quality neurosurgical services worldwide.

Towards a collaborative-integrative model of education and training in neurosurgery in low and middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgery inequity between High-Income Countries and Low- and Middle-Income Countries is striking. Currently, several models of education and training are available each has advantages and limitations. Our goal is to suggest an integrative model of Education and Training with international collaboration which will assure the most cost-effective Training Model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the literature narratively and examined in broad stroke the different existing models of international education and training programs to analyze their strengths, limitations, and cost-effectiveness in addressing the needs of Neurosurgery in Low and middle-Income Countries. RESULTS: Several international institutions have been involved in Education and Training in Global Neurosurgery. The most common models for international education include short-term surgical mission and boot camps, a full residency training program in HICs, and a full residency training Program in Local or regional World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) reference centers in Low and Middle-Income Countries, and online education. In Africa, both Local residency training centers and WFNS reference centers are available and provide full training programs in Neurosurgery. Among them, WFNS Rabat Training Center is the first established center in Africa in 2002. This program is supported by the WFNS Foundation and by the Africa 100 Project. Some of these education models face currently challenges such as sustainability, financial support, and ethical issues. CONCLUSION: Training neurosurgeons from Low and Middle-Income countries in local and regional WFNS Training centers might be the most cost-effective model of training that helps close the gap in neurosurgery. This training Model is duplicable and may be integrated into a global cohesive and collaborative model of education with international institutions.

Neurosurgical Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central Germany: A Retrospective Single Center Study of the Second Wave.

The healthcare system has been placed under an enormous burden by the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition to the challenge of providing sufficient care for COVID-19 patients, there is also a need to ensure adequate care for non-COVID-19 patients. We investigated neurosurgical care in a university hospital during the pandemic. We examined the second wave of the pandemic from 1 October 2020 to 15 March 2021 in this retrospective single-center study and compared it to a pre-pandemic period from 1 October 2019 to 15 March 2020. Any neurosurgical intervention, along with patient- and treatment-dependent factors, were recorded. We also examined perioperative complications and unplanned readmissions. A statistical comparison of the study groups was performed. We treated 535 patients with a total of 602 neurosurgical surgeries during the pandemic. This compares to 602 patients with 717 surgeries during the pre-pandemic period. There were 67 fewer patients (reduction to 88.87%) admitted and 115 fewer surgeries (reduction to 83.96%) performed, which were essentially highly elective procedures, such as cervical spinal stenosis, intracranial neurinomas, and peripheral nerve lesions. Regarding complication rates and unplanned readmissions, there was no significant difference between the COVID-19 pandemic and the non-pandemic patient group. Operative capacities were slightly reduced to 88% due to the pandemic. Nevertheless, comprehensive emergency and elective care was guaranteed in our university hospital. This speaks for the sufficient resources and high-quality processes that existed even before the pandemic.